European Commission Nixes Across-the-Board Member Country Online Gambling Synchronicity, Mirroring States’ Rights Issues

Europea<span id="more-16953"></span>n Commission Nixes Across-the-Board Member Country Online Gambling Synchronicity, Mirroring States’ Rights Issues

The European Commission’s Harrie Temmink, who told ICE last week that EU-wide online gambling legislation would perhaps not take place in his life time ‘or the next.’

The European Commission (EC) has abandoned the thought of a pan-European framework that is regulatory online gambling, accepting that each member states mostly oppose synchronizing their Internet video gaming laws. The move interestingly mirrors similar dilemmas in america, where states’ rights vs. federal dictates have grown to be a battle that is ongoing the iGaming wars.

Talking at last week’s International Casino Exhibition in London (ICE), Harrie Temmink told the industry emphatically that the EC had not been working on sector-specific legislation in gambling.

‘The Commission is not proposing it and will not propose it,’ he said. ‘Not in my life time or the next.’

Temmink leads the gambling team unit and chairs the EC’s Professional Group on Gambling Services.

This is a cry that is far the EC’s previous stance. In 2011, Internal Market and Services Commissioner Michel Barnier proposed a framework that is eu-wide to protecting consumers and citizens, preventing fraud, and maintaining the integrity of sports.

EU Action Plan

Barnier’s view at that time was that ‘the prevailing regulatory, societal and[online that is technical] issues in the EU’ could never be ‘tackled adequately by user states individually.’

‘This is very true given the cross-border dimension of on the web gambling,’ he stated in 2012, when it was established that the EC would prepare an ‘action plan’ to simplify the regulation of the sector and encourage cooperation between member states.

The EC frowned on the regulatory actions which had been taken in France, Italy, and Spain, which saw those markets ring-fenced and operators taxed at a higher level, in apparent conflict with EU ideals of free motion of services between member states.

Barnier’s plan had beenn’t proposing just one licensing that is EU, but instead had the goal of ensuring that member states adopted its vision for an even more liberal regulatory landscape across Europe. Member states that declined to play ball would be sanctioned, then in Barnier’s vision.

But Barnier left the post in 2014, and his successor, Günther Oettinger, appears less zealous about pushing the cause and more resigned to regulation that is leaving specific jurisdictions.

More Fragmented than Ever

As Temmink explained, ‘we can assure you that if we proposed legislation on gambling, in the first meeting with the Council, we would have 26 out of 28 member states that could be fiercely opposed to the proposal.

‘It will be committing suicide,’ he added.

Since Barnier outlined their plan in 2012, a wave of brand new legislation has spread across Europe, and many brand new licensing regimes have sprung up, from the British to Portugal. Europe has become also less coordinated on the iGaming front, therefore the fragmented regulatory landscape proves a greater challenge to operators than ever.

‘Operators need to enjoy a license for the country that is specific that they offer games, without being able to count on the recognition of licenses between one European country and another,’ said Temmink. ‘For their part is for the Member States to make sure a non-discriminatory system of issuing licenses.’

Nevada Voters Courted by Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, Democratic Caucus Is Key

Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton are focused on reaching as numerous Nevada voters as possible before the Silver State caucuses on Feb. 23rd in what’s shaping up to be a make-or-break point within the campaign that is democratic. (Image: Jim Young/Reuters)

Nevada voters are the center of attention for both Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders’ campaigns right now, as the two Democratic presidential nominees attempt to persuade as numerous last-minute voters to vote for them before this week’s February 23rd caucus.

After Clinton’s slim victory in Iowa, followed by a hefty defeat in New Hampshire, the Silver State had long been considered to be her roadblock to stop any Bernie Sanders momentum. She once held a lead that is nearly 50-point her challengers, but Sanders’ grassroots movement has severely tightened the race, with numerous analysts now believing Nevada is up for grabs.

Clinton and Sanders each spent the week-end making stops around the state. Sanders campaigned in Reno on Saturday, then Las vegas, nevada on Sunday, while their opponent met with voters in several locations around the gaming mecca throughout the weekend.

The two Democrats concluded the weekend on Sunday at the Victory Missionary Baptist Church in Las Vegas, a congregation largely made up of African-Americans.

‘we send a profound message to the entire country, and that message is that the people of this country will no longer accept establishment politics,’ Sanders said during his brief remarks if we can win here in Nevada.

Clinton responded to Sanders with line as vague as Bernie’s plan of exactly how he will fund his utopian vision.

‘I am maybe not an issue that is single,’ Clinton said. ‘ Because if we were going to achieve everything about banks and money and politics, would that final end racism?’

Say what now?

Nevada Key State in Runoff

Whenever Sanders officially announced his decision to run for the presidency in May, the so-called ‘Clinton machine’ was already likely to work in Nevada. Volunteers were making hundreds of daily phone calls, going door-to-door, and obtaining endorsements from key state and local leaders.

The Vermont senator didn’t have much of a chance, at least according to pundits that are political.

Fast-forward nine months, and Clinton just canceled an event in Florida this week to stay the course in Nevada and shake every hand, ascend each phase, and grasp every microphone she can before Nevadans head to caucus on Saturday.

Nevada has a long history of being fully a swing state within the general presidential election, and its constituents have an almost perfect record of voting for the winner that is eventual. Since 1912, Nevada has precisely selected the president that is next except for in 1976, whenever Nevada went to Gerald Ford over Jimmy Carter.

A win in Nevada for Clinton would be anticipated, while a win for Sanders pull off just what would perhaps function as the biggest political upset in modern history.

Neck-in-Neck to the Finish

Nevada hosts the gambling epicenter of the United States, therefore perhaps it is appropriate that there’s small statistical evidence to run on in determining which candidate will win on Saturday.

The reality is that wagering on Clinton or Sanders is equivalent to wagering on black or red. Probably the most recent poll from TargetPoint, 1st governmental information on the competition since late December, has Clinton and Sanders tied 45-45.

Scalia Death Further Stirs the Pot

Adding to your intensity of it all, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia passed away on Saturday in Texas of apparent causes that are natural the age of 79. Appointed towards the bench by President Reagan in 1986, the consistently conservative judge’s death leaves a vacancy on the highest court that is already causing more political divide between Republicans and Democrats.

A number of names have previously been tossed around, including current Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval (R). Though Sandoval’s GOP label might make him seem unlikely for the Obama endorsement, his pro-choice and pro-immigration views could make the first Silver State governor of Hispanic heritage a welcomed compromise to both conservative and liberal congressional leaders.

Nevada Gaming Regulator Michonne Ascuaga Resigns Over Alleged Sparks Nugget Improprieties

Michonne Ascuaga, that has resigned through the Nevada Gaming Commission in the wake of the news that a home she formerly managed with her family, the Sparks Nugget in northern Nevada, is being examined for lax anti-money laundering controls. (Image:

Michonne Ascuaga has resigned from her post regarding the Nevada Gaming Commission, following the revelation of alleged financial improprieties at the Sparks Nugget, the casino in northern Nevada that she handled for 16 years.

The Nugget will be investigated by the U.S. Department of Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) over allegations it didn’t comply with financial regulations during Ascuaga’s tenure, and neglected to establish an effective anti-money laundering system.

The investigation stumbled on light in a court filing week that is last as part of a longstanding contractual lawsuit brought by the Ascuaga family members against the casino’s new owners, Wolfhound Holdings, the private investment team that purchased the property in 2013.

Sandoval Unaware of Investigation

April a spokeswoman for Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval said that Sandoval was unaware of the investigation when he appointed Ascuaga to the Gaming Commission panel last.

‘Michonne Ascuaga has served the Nevada Gaming Commission well,’ wrote Brian Sandoval in accepting the resignation. ‘I admire her and wish to recognize her family’s long history as leaders in the video gaming industry.

‘I appreciate that she has put the credibility and reputation of this Gaming Commission first,’ he added. ‘Michonne is a consummate professional and will still be a leader in our community.’

Ascuaga has claimed within an statement that is official she ‘did not purposely hold back information from the governor.’

‘The Sparks Nugget ended up being informed in November 2013 by the Department of Treasury that the Department was investigating she added whether it was appropriate to impose civil penalties for possible violations of anti-money laundering regulations. ‘The matter arose from an examination that is audit-type by the IRS at the casino this year. This was all disclosed immediately to your buyer.’

Ascuaga Lawsuit

It really is alleged that the Nugget is being investigated for laxity in its reporting and record-keeping requirements. By legislation, all businesses must file a Currency Transaction Report on all deals over $10,000, and report any activity that is suspicious FinCEN, as a means of guarding against money-laundering.

Ascuaga is the daughter of John L. Ascuaga, the son of a Basque shepherd who owned the Nugget for over 50 years before its sale to Wolfhound. The Ascuaga family believes it’s still owed $500,000 underneath the purchase and purchase agreement of the Nugget.

Ascuaga said she was resigning ‘out of deep respect for the Nevada Gaming Commission and also to not allow myself to become an unnecessary distraction from the crucial regulatory oversight work it does.’

Leave a comment